Contacteer ons

Your Paper, Your Path. Every thing should really be made as easy as possible, although not easier.

Your Paper, Your Path. Every thing should really be made as easy as possible, although not easier.

Your Paper, Your Path. Every thing should really be made as easy as possible, although not easier.

– Related To Albert Einstein


Prezi for more information on Your Paper, your path

A plea that is recurring scientists is actually to simplify the entire process of planning and publishing documents. With every log having various technical and formatting demands and several documents being submitted over and over again before book, writers think it is onerous to possess to invest time that is valuable in the place of engaging utilizing the more effective facets of research. In fact, almost one in three scientists suggested manuscripts that are“preparing when asked what work tasks they discovered many difficult or time intensive, in a study performed by Elsevier’s analysis and Academic Relations department in 2012.

Using the purpose of making the distribution process easier, the Elsevier log, complimentary revolutionary Biology and Medicine launched Your Paper, Your Way (YPYW) last year. YPYW is a less strenuous distribution process, concentrating on the grade of the technology within the initial phases of distribution and just elements that are requiring for ultimate manufacturing in the modification stage. If documents are refused, this easier distribution procedure saves writers effort and time and in addition, can help them attain quicker book rates write my research papers.

YPYW has been extended to a huge selection of Elsevier journals. Every log that provides YPYW plainly shows this at the start of its guide for writers, as follows:

” We currently differentiate amongst the needs for new and revised submissions. You might elect to submit your manuscript as being A word that is single or file to be utilized within the refereeing process. Only once your paper has reached the modification phase, are you required to put your paper as a ‘correct structure’ for acceptance and offer those items needed for the book of one’s article.”

Your Paper, The Right Path demands

  • Authors may submit their manuscript (text, numbers and tables) as a file that is single. This could be A term or PDF file, in just about any structure or design, and numbers and tables may be put inside the text.
  • Numbers should always be of high quality that is enough refereeing.
  • There are not any strict formatting needs but all manuscripts must retain the crucial elements necessary to evaluate a manuscript (Abstract, keyword phrases, Introduction, components & techniques, outcomes, Conclusions, Artwork and Tables with Captions).
  • Sources may be in every style or format, as long because the style is consistent. Author(s) name(s), journal title/book name, article name (where necessary), 12 months of book, amount & problem /book chapter therefore the pagination needs to be current. Usage of DOI is very motivated. The guide design employed by the log will be reproduced to your accepted article by Elsevier during the proof stage.
  • When the revision is reached by a paper phase, authors are going to be required to supply any items which continue to be needed for book, for instance editable source files.

Reactions to YPYW

YPYW happens to be absolutely gotten by writers. In a study delivered by Elsevier’s analysis and Academic Relations department to writers who’d chosen YPYW whenever submitting their manuscript, of this 3,958 authors surveyed, 70% responded positively whenever asked, “Did Your Paper, your path decrease the length of time it normally takes to format and submit the manuscript?” responses received from surveyed writers included:

. time-consuming formatting work ended up being perhaps perhaps not undertaken needlessly.

I did not need to spend time with formatting before being certain concerning the acceptance.

It absolutely was easier and faster than [the] traditional one. I believe it’s a good option to speed the procedure.

92% of writers surveyed found YPYW simple or incredibly effortless, when compared with 61per cent of writers who utilized the process that is traditional.

To gauge the effect on reviewers, 870 reactions from Elsevier’s current Reviewer Feedback Programme (RFP) were analyzed, of which 346 associated with a YPYW submission. There have been no differences that are significant reviewer satisfaction. Some reviewers have actually complimented the noticeable modification as it makes their everyday lives better to check out the numbers and tables in the text, in the place of by the end regarding the manuscript as is typically needed.

Further reading

“Your Paper, Your Way”, Kelvin J A Davies, PhD, DSc, Editor-in-Chief, Complimentary Revolutionary Biology & Medicine

“Your Paper, the right path plus the reviewing procedure”, Catriona Fennell, Rebecca Barrie